The Treasury is consulting on its proposed regulations to implement the new Payment Services Directive (PSD2) in the UK. The consultation ends on 16 March 2017 and the regulations must take effect on 13 January 2018. The FCA will consult on the guidance related to its supervisory role in Q2 2017. Time is tight and there are still plenty of unanswered questions, which I've been covering in a series of posts. In this one, I'm exploring the issues related to the new "account information service", which is being interpreted very broadly indeed by the FCA. Firms providing such services will need to register with the FCA, rather than become fully authorised (unless they provide other payment services); and they are spared from compliance with a number of provisions that apply to other types of payment service provider. But now is the time for assessing whether a service qualifies, and whether to restructure or become registered.
The Treasury has, naturally, copied the definition from the directive:
‘account information service’ means an online service to provide consolidated information on one or more payment accounts held by the payment service user with either another payment service provider or with more than one payment service provider (article 4(16)) - [my emphasis] - but has added:
"and includes such a service whether information is provided—
(a) in its original form or after processing;
(b) only to the payment service user or to the payment service user and to another person in accordance with the payment service user’s instructions" [which do not appear in PSD2]This reflects the government's broad definition of the directive (para 6.27 of the consultation paper) - consistent with the UK needlessly creating a rod for its own back and particularly ironic in the light of Brexit. The account information service provider (AISP) should be granted access by the account service provider to the same data on the payment account as the user of that account (para 6.25). A firm will be considered an AISP even if it only "uses" some and not all of that account information to provide "an information service" (para 6.28).
Services that the government believes are AISs include (but are not limited to):
- dashboard services that show aggregated information across a number of payment accounts;
- price comparison and product identification services;
- income and expenditure analysis, including affordability and credit rating or credit worthiness assessments; and
- expenditure analysis that alerts users to consequences of particular actions, such as breaching their overdraft limit.
Some key points to consider:
- does it matter to whom the account information service is provided? The additional wording seems to suggest that the 'payment service user' must be at least one recipient of the information, but does that mean the payment service user of the payment account or the person using the account information service? This would seem to cover every firm that prepares and files tax or VAT returns, for example, since these are usually provided to both the client and HMRC.
- the service has to be "online", but what if some of it is not?
- little seems to turn on the word "consolidated", since the Treasury says a firm only needs to use some of the information from the payment account to be offering an AIS, and it could be from only one payment account. For instance, what if a service provides a simple 'yes' or 'no' to a balance inquiry or request to say whether adequate funds are available in an account, and that 'information' or conclusion/knowledge is not drawn from the payment account itself, but merely based on comparing the balance with the amount in the customer's inquiry or proposed transaction?
- the payment account that the information relates to must be 'held by the payment service user' with one or more PSPs, so presumably this would not include an online data account or electronic statement that shows the amount of funds held for and on behalf of a client in a trust account or other form of safeguarded or segregated account which is in the name of, say, a law firm or crowdfunding platform operator (albeit designated and acknowledged as holding 'client money' or 'customer funds');
- it seems impossible for the relevant data to provided in its 'original form', since data has to be processed in some way to be 'provided' online, but this could cover providers of personal data stores or cloud services that simply hold a copy of your bank data for later access;
- what is meant by 'after processing':
it may not be clear that a firm is providing information 'on a payment account', as opposed to the same information from another type of account;
does this mean each data processor in a series of processors is providing an AIS to its customer(s) - which brings us back to whether it matters who the customer is - or does interim processing 'break the chain' so that the next processor can say that the information was not 'on a payment account' but came from some other service provider's database (whether or not it was an AIS), such as a credit reference agency?
what about accounting/tax software providers providers who calculate your income and expenditure by reference to payment account information but may not necessarily display or 'provide' the underlying data - although presumably the figures for bank account interest income (if any) in a tax return might qualify?
Update on 21 April 2017:
The FCA has indicated in Question 25A of its proposed draft changes to the Perimeter Guidance that:
"Account information service providers include businesses that provide users with an electronic “dashboard” where they can view information from various payment accounts in a single place, businesses that use account data to provide users with personalised comparison services, and businesses that, on a user’s instruction, provide information from the user’s various payment accounts to both the user and third party service providers such as financial advisors or credit reference agencies." [my emphasis added]
Thanks for sharing the additional information with us, credit card processing for small business
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteVat Returns in the UK are less procedural and clear. Any information concerning VAT benefit is available for HM Revenue and Customs site with genuine guidelines and steps so its organization isn't that inconvenient. You can manage your VAT by keeping its comprehensive record and bookkeeping.
ReplyDelete제주출장마싸지 김포출장마싸지 안양출장마싸지 1인출장샵 1인출장샵 1인출장샵
ReplyDeletekralbet
ReplyDeletebetpark
tipobet
slot siteleri
kibris bahis siteleri
poker siteleri
bonus veren siteler
mobil ödeme bahis
betmatik
5AE
yuijyiuytujytukjytki
ReplyDeleteشركة تنظيف سجاد بالجبيل
شركة صيانة افران بالاحساء rZg7N8LgK2
ReplyDeleteافران جدة amsioF6hIf
ReplyDelete